|
Outline
In his groundbreaking statement before the fifty-third session of
the United Nations General Assembly in New York on 21 September
1998(!), President Mohammed Khatami of Iran made the following compelling
appeal to the world community:
" If humanity, at the threshold of the new century and
millennium devotes all efforts to institutionalize dialogue, replacing
hostility and confrontation with discourse and understanding,
it would leave an invaluable legacy for the benefit of the future
generations."
In response, the General Assembly on 4 November 1998 proclaimed
the year 2001 as the United Nations Year of Dialogue among Civilizations.
The assembly recognized "the diverse civilizational achievements
of mankind, crystallizing cultural pluralism and creative diversity."
"Crossing the Divide", was the most appropriate title
of the publication, prepared by a Group of twenty Eminent Persons,
chaired by Giandomenico Picco, the personal representative of secretary-general
Kofi Annan for the United Nations Year of Dialogue among Civilizations.
Much has happened since President Khatami's speech and the decision
of the UNGA, in particular on 9/11 and thereafter. All these events
only underlined how important and timely the initiative in fact
had been. Many people believe that the cornerstones of civilizations
are their respective religious traditions. Considering the wars
and conflicts in many parts of the world that have taken place since
the late 1970s, we may be persuaded that differences in religion
and the ways in which these religions have helped structure differing
civilizations, are factors that have greatly contributed to the
wars and conflicts not just in the long past, but still in recent
years.
"Crossing the Divide", whatever that divide seems to be,
is the first step in learning how to manage and appreciate diversity.
It is a quality new generations may find indispensable. Indeed,
the study of religion and the relations between religions and civilizations,
may contribute importantly to the development of a culture of understanding
through dialogue. Crucial for the sincerity and the quality of such
dialogue, however, is full admission of the equality of nations
and peoples. Whoever engages in dialogue with another party, must
respect and accept that party as an equal partner. Dialogue is not
competitive for it is not about winning, but about understanding
and having respect for the other. In dialogue, therefore, speaking
is less important than listening.
Wars originate primarily from competition among nations, often neighbours.
Without competition, without the drive to prevail, wars would not
emerge and unfold. Conflicts also originate from the inability of
people, of communities, to negotiate and settle their disagreements
by peaceful means. The recourse to force and violence can seem the
only way to settle a dispute. Such a recourse appears even more
an option, when people in dispute have only a fantasized idea of
each other. Wars, indeed, are largely the outcome of fears, prejudices
and misunderstandings; all pathologies that essentially relate to
ignorance of the other and which knowledge can help to cure. More
in-depth knowledge of religions, of the beliefs and values of people
would be a major step forward to a culture of understanding through
dialogue.
|