Outline
Nothing should inspire more suspicion than a theory proposed without
credible empirical evidence or a feasible method of verification.
We have learned that this was the character of the wild, risky,
and unbridled speculative theories of the pioneering Religionswissenschaftler,
now left behind in the prescientific past. But if we cast our glance
beyond the pale of such doctrinal principles and moral strictures
of disciplinary orthodoxy, it appears that, in the real world, neither
the suspicion nor the disbelief provoked by a particular theory
necessarily prevents it from circulating broadly and producing some
irreversible effects. Psychoanalytic theory may be cited as a phenomenon
exemplifying this truth.
Today, the number of people who positively identify themselves
as advocates of Freud or as proponents of psychoanalysis is relatively
small if measured in the general population. But for a system that
few people actually "believe in" or would actively endorse
as valid and true, the language of psychoanalysis seems to enjoy
extraordinary popularity and easy currency among those very people
who presumably don't "buy" it. From unconscious desire
to slips of the tongue, from the Oedipus complex to the death drive,
things marked Freudian are indeed flooding our everyday life,
while the gamut of popular culture, mass media, and advertising
industry seem to testify to psychoanalysis' overwhelming efficacy.
How could something so fundamentally dubious in theory be so irresistibly
effective in practice?
Taking as our starting point this spectacular contradiction in
the placement of psychoanalysis in the present world, I propose
to initiate a possibly serious consideration as to how, and why,
a patently incredible theory could on occasion come to have an enduring
effect, and what we could possibly infer from this phenomenon about
our relation to what we call "theory."
|